|
Alberta Game Warden Association
Home
Executive
Awards
Pictures
30th Anniversary
History
Career Info
Programs
Members Only
Links
Alberta Game
Warden Magazine
Archives
| |
|
QUEBEC
KILLING
CREW
A
trail
of
blood
from
Saskatchewan
to
Alberta |
|

Saskatchewan
investigators
seized
eight
white-tailed
deer
from
a
trio
of
Quebec
hunters.
They
had
been
killing
and
caching
them
in
the
bush
to
be
picked
later.
Officers
discovered
that
the
animals
were
tagged
with
Saskatchewan
and
Manitoba
deer
tags.
|
Part
I
Passing
the
buck
By
Saskatchewan
Conservation
Officer
Casey
Howey |
|
|

Officers
seized
numerous
pieces
of
evidence,
including
three
rifles
that
matched
the
empty
brass
found
at
the
scenes.
|
On
Nov.
25,
2003,
the
Porcupine
Plain
office
of
Saskatchewan
Environment
received
a
complaint
from
the
Weekes
area
regarding
a
whitetail
buck
that
had
been
shot
and
left.
The
animal
had
been
shot
on
posted
land,
dragged
into
a
hay
field
where
the
antlers
were
removed
and
the
carcass
left
to
rot
until
it
was
unfit
for
human
consumption.
Bullet
casings
found
near
the
scene
were
noted
to
be
of
an
unusual
calibre.
The
next
morning
a
report
came
in
of
another
deer
that
had
been
found,
under
circumstances
similar
to
the
earlier
kill.
Later
that
afternoon
another
deer
was
reported
shot
and
left
on
private
land.
Upon
investigation
it
became
apparent
that
officers
were
dealing
with
a
group
of
poachers
who
were
intent
on
collecting
antlers
and
not
concerned
about
wasting
the
carcasses.
All
three
kill
sites
were
within
100
kilometres
of
each
other
and,
given
the
similarity
of
the
evidence
recovered
by
investigators,
they
embarked
on
a
hunt
for
a
group
of
poachers.
Officers
had
been
kept
exceptionally
busy
during
that
particular
week
as
a
result
of
the
illegal
activities
of
another
crew
that
was
operating
in
the
same
area—shooting
deer
and
caching
them
in
the
bush.
In
that
case,
an
early
morning
patrol
paid
dividends
when
officers
discovered
a
group
of
three
hunters
from
Quebec
picking
up
deer
killed
earlier
in
the
week
and
tagging
them
with
Saskatchewan
tags
and
deer
tags
issued
from
Manitoba.
They
were
found
in
possession
of
eight
whitetails
and
were
later
sentenced
to
pay
fines
of
$5,210
as
well
as
face
a
mandatory
one-year
hunting
licence
suspension. |
|
Officers
from
the
Greenwater
field
office
maintained
their
efforts
to
find
those
responsible
for
the
headless
deer,
but
as
the
week
passed
it
appeared
as
though
the
crimes
would
go
unsolved.
However,
on
the
afternoon
of
Nov.
28,
there
was
a
break
in
the
case.
Officers
stopped
a
vehicle
with
hunters
traveling
towards
Porcupine
Plain.
Upon
inspection,
they
located
rifle
casings
and
other
evidence
that
was
consistent
with
the
headless
deer
case.
The
trio
of
suspects,
also
from
Quebec,
were
detained
and
taken
to
the
Porcupine
Plain
office
for
further
questioning.
A
subsequent
search
of
the
vehicle
produced
various
hunting
articles,
including
blood-stained
clothing,
blood
stains
in
the
carpet
of
the
vehicle,
various
video
cameras
and
tapes,
and
a
shell
box
filled
with
exposed
35mm
camera
film.
In
addition,
global
positioning
(GPS)
devices
and
firearms
that
matched
the
empty
shell
casings
were
recovered.
Upon
questioning,
the
three
denied
any
involvement
in
any
illegal
hunting
activities.
All
three
were
still
in
possession
of
their
Saskatchewan
white-tailed
deer
tags.
Additional
evidence
was
recovered
relating
to
their
hunting
activities
in
Saskatchewan
as
well
as
activities
that
had
occurred
in
the
Province
of
Alberta.
Officers
forwarded
photographic
evidence
and
GPS
information
to
Alberta
authorities
and
subsequently
made
contact
with
the
Fish
and
Wildlife
district
office
in
Provost.
Investigators
developed
the
35mm
film
the
next
day.
A
picture
is
worth
a
thousand
words
and
those
photographs
spoke
volumes.
The
group’s
activities
in
Alberta
and
Saskatchewan
over
the
previous
two
week
period
began
to
come
to
light.
Photographic
evidence
showed
seven
sets
of
antlers,
skull
split
and
displayed
on
a
hotel
room
floor.
It
seemed
likely
that
the
antlers
had
already
been
shipped
away.
With
assistance
from
fellow
officers
in
Lloydminster,
investigators
determined
the
location
of
the
hotel
room.
Once
again
officers
caught
a
break
when
the
seven
sets
of
antlers
that
had
been
boxed
up
for
shipment
to
Quebec
had
been
returned
to
the
hotel
by
the
courier
because
blood
was
leaking
from
the
container.
That
evidence
was
subsequently
seized
by
Lloydminster
conservation
officers.
Slowly
but
surely
Saskatchewan
officers
began
to
piece
the
case
together.
They
spent
days
on
the
investigation,
collecting
and
examining
evidence.
As
a
result,
numerous
charges
were
laid
against
the
trio.
Remi
Poulin
was
convicted
of
11
counts
under
the
Saskatchewan
Wildlife
Act
(SWA)
and
one
count
under
the
federal
Wild
Animal
and
Plant
Protection
and
Regulation
of
International
and
Interprovincial
Trade
Act
(WAPPRITTA).
Fines
of
$6,835
were
handed
down,
as
well
as
a
three-year
hunting
suspension
and
the
forfeiture
of
his
firearm
(valued
at
$5,000)
to
the
provincial
government.
Yvon
Poulin
was
convicted
of
eight
counts
under
SWA
and
handed
fines
of
$2,915,
a
hunting
suspension
of
three
years
and
forfeiture
of
his
firearm
(valued
at
$3,500).
Bernard
Metevier
was
convicted
of
nine
counts
under
SWA.
His
fines
were
$5,250,
including
a
hunting
suspension
of
three
years
and
forfeiture
of
his
firearm
(valued
at
$5,000).
Saskatchewan
investigators
did
not
recover
any
of
the
antlers
from
the
deer
they
had
killed
in
Saskatchewan.
The
accused
indicated
they
had
simply
thrown
them
away.
All
of
the
animals
that
were
recovered
were
deemed
unfit
for
human
consumption
and
were
therefore
wasted.
In
spite
of
the
evidence
that
had
been
gathered,
there
were
still
a
lot
of
questions
that
had
no
answers.
It
was
up
to
our
counterparts
in
Alberta
to
fill
in
the
gaps.
|
Part
II
The
buck
stopped
here
By
Alberta
Fish
and
Wildlife
Officer
Lee
Robley |
|
|
On
Nov.
29,
2003,
information
was
received
at
the
Provost
Fish
and
Wildlife
office
from
Saskatchewan
conservation
officers
(COs).
They
had
apprehended
and
were
investigating
three
Quebec
hunters
who
had
been
shooting
deer
in
Saskatchewan
and
only
taking
the
antlers.
The
suspects
were
Remi
Poulin,
Yvon
Poulin
and
Bernard
Metivier.
Saskatchewan
COs
advised
that
all
three
men
had
Quebec
addresses
on
their
Saskatchewan
hunting
licences.
Among
the
items
seized
from
the
men
in
Saskatchewan
were
photos,
rifles,
a
rental
vehicle
and
a
GPS
unit
containing
waypoint
entries.
During
the
course
of
their
investigation,
Saskatchewan
officers |

An
aerial
photograph
of
the
Provost
area
in
Alberta:
green
dots
are
kill
sites
located
by
the
investigator
and
complainants;
yellow
dots
are
waypoints
taken
from
the
GPS
unit
seized
in
Saskatchewan. |
| had
made
patrols
to
the
waypoint
locations
in
Saskatchewan
This
lead
them
to
two
kill
sites
(out
of
the
five
to
seven
waypoints
in
Saskatchewan)
where
evidence
against
the
three
men
was
obtained.
Waypoint
locations
(taken
from
the
seized
GPS
unit)
believed
to
be
in
Alberta
were
forwarded
to
the
Provost
investigator,
as
well
as
copies
of
some
of
the
seized
photos
showing
the
suspects
with
deer
believed
to
have
been
taken
in
Alberta.
It
was
determined
that
seven
waypoint
locations
forwarded
from
the
Saskatchewan
COs
were
located
in
the
Provost
district
in
Alberta,
and
an
investigation
was
initiated.
On
Nov.
30,
armed
with
aerial
photos
identifying
the
GPS
locations
and
the
waypoints
entered
onto
another
GPS
unit,
an
investigator
began
a
ground
search
that
would
last
four
days.
On
Dec.
3,
with
snow
beginning
to
obscure
visibility
and
having
walked
ever
widening
circles
around
the
waypoint
locations,
hope
was
fading.
As
the
officer
was
about
to
turn
back
to
his
patrol
unit,
a
magpie
flew
past
him
and
he
decided
to
follow
along
in
that
direction.
After
going
another
150
yards
into
the
bush
he
was
about
to
turn
back
again,
but
the
squawk
of
more
birds
led
him
on.
The
black
and
white
scouts
had
done
their
job.
The
officer
discovered
a
mule
deer
carcass
with
the
antlers
removed.
Using
a
seized
photo
of
two
suspects
with
an
antlered
mule
deer,
he
looked
at
the
terrain
and
concluded
that
it
was
a
match.
Does
a
tree
falling
in
the
forest
or
an
officer
in
the
bush
discovering
critical
evidence
make
a
sound?
He
collected
DNA
samples
and
photographic
evidence
at
the
site.
The
importance
of
public
participation
in
the
reporting
of
offences
cannot
be
overstated.
Back
on
Nov.
22,
2003,
a
complainant
had
reported
a
whitetail
buck
that
had
been
shot
and
left
with
only
the
antlers
removed.
On
Jan.
5,
2004,
the
investigating
officer
returned
to
that
location
with
a
new
photo,
one
which
had
not
been
shipped
to
him
earlier
by
the
Saskatchewan
COs.
The
officer
could
now
compare
this
new
photo,
which
 |

showed
another
suspect
with
a
deer,
with
the
kill
site.
The
background
in
the
photo
appeared
to
match.
Although
DNA
samples
and
photographic
evidence
had
been
collected
from
this
location
back
in
November,
more
were
taken.
DNA
samples
and
photos
had
also
been
collected
by
the
officer
in
relation
to
another
complaint
received
in
November
involving
a
mule
deer
that
had
been
reported
shot
and
left
with
its
head
removed.
Both
of
these
events
had
taken
place
in
the
general
vicinity,
but
not
immediately
near
the
waypoint
locations
that
had
been
searched.
DNA
samples
from
the
seven
sets
of
antlers
seized
in
Macklin
Saskatchewan
were
obtained
from
Saskatchewan
COs
in
Lloydminster,
and
along
with
the
DNA
samples
collected
from
the
Alberta
kill
sites,
they
were
submitted
to
the
Fish
and
Wildlife
forensic
lab
in
Edmonton
for
DNA
matching.
DNA
analysis
done
at
the
lab
confirmed
that
three
of
the
seven
sets
of
antlers
seized
in
Saskatchewan
matched
deer
remains
found
at
three
kill
sites
in
Alberta.
Photo
forensic
analysis
done
by
the
Edmonton
Police
Service
confirmed
that
the
photos
taken
by
the
Alberta
investigator
at
two
of
the
kill
sites
in
Alberta
matched
two
of
the
locations
depicted
in
the
background
of
the
photos
seized
by
Saskatchewan
officers,
reaffirming
the
DNA
analysis
in
two
instances. |
| Charged
in
relation
to
the
three
deer
proven
to
have
been
shot
and
left
in
Alberta
were
Remi
Poulin,
Bernard
Metivier
and
Yvon
Poulin.
Through
the
course
of
the
investigation
the
Alberta
Control
Center,
RELMS
and
ISM
databases
were
queried
and
the
name
Mario
Pepin
emerged.
Remi
Poulin
and
Mario
Pepin
had
been
together
on
a
guided
hunt
in
Alberta
as
non-resident
Canadians
from
Quebec
in
November
of
1995.
Both
men
had
obtained
Alberta
driver’s
licences
on
Nov.
20,
1995.
They
used
the
same
Alberta
address
as
their
place
of
residence.
A
statement
obtained
by
Alberta
investigators
from
a
person
living
at
the
address
identified
on
Remi
and
Mario’s
driver’s
licences
confirmed
that
neither
had
ever
lived
at
that
address.
Both
Remi
and
Mario
held
valid
Quebec
driver’s
licences
at
the
same
time
they
held
valid
Alberta
driver’s
licences
during
the
time
period
relating
to
this
investigation. |
|

|
 |
Information
received
from
Quebec
provincial
officers
indicated
that
Mario
Pepin
and
Remi
Poulin
had
been
registering
big
game
animals
taken
under
Quebec
resident
hunting
licences
every
year
from
1995
to
2003
in
Quebec.
Statements
taken
by
Canadian
Wildlife
Service
officers
in
Quebec
confirmed
that
Mario
Pepin
and
Remi
Poulin
have
been
and
remain
residents
of
Quebec,
never
living
in
Alberta.
Between
1996
and
2003,
Remi
had
hunted
in
Alberta
as
a
resident
and
had
hosted
hunts
in
Alberta
for
Bernard
Metivier,
Yvon
Poulin
and
others
from
Quebec.
Mario
Pepin,
over
the
same
time
period,
had
also
hunted
in
Alberta
as
a
resident
and
had
hosted
hunts
in
this
province
for
Veronique
Levesque,
Bernard
Metivier
and
other
Quebec
residents.
Both
Mario
and
one
of
the
unnamed
Quebec
hunters
he
had
hosted
registered
elk
taken
in
Alberta
in
1997.
Licence
vendor
queries
showed
that
Remi
Poulin,
Bernard
Metivier
and
Mario
Pepin
acquired
Alberta
hunting
licences
at
the
same
location
on
Nov.
15,
1999,
in
Calgary
and
on
Nov.
16,
in
Calgary
in
2000.
In
2001,
Poulin,
Pepin,
Metivier
and
Veronique
Levesque
acquired
Alberta
hunting
licences
at
the
same
location
on
Nov.
15,
in
Calgary.
In
2003,
Remi
Poulin,
Bernard
Metivier
and
Yvon
Poulin
acquired
Alberta
hunting
licences
on
Nov.
16,
at
the
same
location
in
Calgary.
Mario
Pepin
and
Veronique
Levesque
acquired
their
2003
Alberta
hunting
licences
at
the
same
location
on
Nov.
5,
in
Edmonton.
Remi
Poulin
and
Mario
Pepin
acquired
Alberta
resident
hunting
licences
during
all
of
the
above
transactions,
while
Bernard
Metivier,
Veronique
Levesque
and
Yvon
Poulin
acquired
non-resident
Canadian
licences.
Though
not
found
to
be
involved
with
the
three
shot
and
left
deer
in
Alberta
in
2003,
the
above
information,
as
obtained
through
the
various
database
queries
and
statements,
resulted
in
Mario
Pepin
and
Veronique
Levesque
also
being
charged
with
offences.
On
Feb.
2,
2006,
in
Wainwright
Provincial
Court,
Crown
prosecutor
G.
Marchant
and
Quebec
defence
lawyer
Mr.
Miller,
represented
by
Mr.
Van
Winssen
in
session,
entered
a
joint
submission
on
guilty
pleas,
fine
amounts
and
the
stipulations
as
set
out
in
a
court
order.
The
presiding
judge,
P.T.
Johnson,
accepted
the
submission
as
presented.
Remi
Poulin
of
St
Joseph,
Quebec,
pled
guilty
to
two
counts
of
illegal
possession
under
the
Wildlife
Act
(WA),
two
counts
of
wastage
(WA),
one
count
of
obtaining
a
licence
when
ineligible
(WA)
and
one
count
of
transporting
illegally
obtained
wildlife
across
a
provincial
boundary,
under
WAPPRITTA.
Poulin
was
ordered
to
pay
$8,250
in
fines.
Bernard
Metivier
of
Victorin,
Quebec,
pled
guilty
to
two
counts
of
illegal
possession
(WA),
two
counts
of
wastage
(WA)
and
one
count
of
transporting
illegally
obtained
wildlife
across
a
provincial
boundary
(WAPPRITTA).
Metivier
was
ordered
to
pay
$5,000
in
fines.
Yvon
Poulin
of
St.
Benjamin,
Quebec,
pled
guilty
to
two
counts
of
illegal
possession
(WA),
two
counts
of
wastage
(WA)
and
one
count
of
transporting
illegally
obtained
wildlife
across
a
provincial
boundary
(WAPPRITTA).
Poulin
was
ordered
to
pay
$5,750
in
fines.
Mario
Pepin
of
St.
Benjamin,
Quebec,
pled
guilty
to
one
count
of
obtaining
a
licence
when
ineligible
(WA).
Pepin
was
ordered
to
pay
$7,000
in
fines.
Veronique
Levesque
of
St.
Benjamin,
Quebec,
pled
guilty
to
one
count
of
obtaining
a
licence
when
ineligible
(WA).
Levesque
was
ordered
to
pay
$750
in
fines.
The
court
order
signed
by
Judge
P.T.
Johnson
stipulated
that
all
five
individuals:
•
Are
ineligible
to
obtain,
hold
or
apply
for
a
recreational
hunting
licence
within
the
province
of
Alberta
for
five
years
commencing
from
the
date
of
conviction;
•
That
all
fines
levied
against
them
be
paid
to
the
Alberta
Conservation
Association
and
assigned
to
the
University
of
Alberta
for
their
use
in
obtaining
material
identified
by
the
University
of
Alberta
as
essential
to
their
research
involving
deer
movement
along
the
Alberta/Saskatchewan
border
pertaining
to
chronic
wasting
disease;
•
Must
report
to
a
Fish
and
Wildlife
Division
office
in
Alberta
prior
to
obtaining
a
hunting
licence
or
hunting
in
Alberta
(for
life).
There
are
questions
relating
to
this
file
that
may
never
be
answered.
But
if
you
have
ever
wondered
to
what
lengths
provincial
or
federal
wildlife
agencies
and
police
services
will
go
to
see
justice
served,
herein
lies
the
answer.
|
| First
time
hunters
are
off
on
the
right
foot |
|

|
| Jim
Mitchell |
|
I
have
been
an
Alberta
Fish
and
Wildlife
officer
for
25
years
and
have
observed
many
situations
involving
young
hunters
who
violated
game
and
safety
laws.
Following
discussions
with
those
young
hunters,
I
determined
two
things;
they
had
very
little
experience
with
firearms
and
hunting
laws
and
no
one
had
taken
the
time
to
show
them
the
proper
and
lawful
way
of
doing
things.
If
they
had
been
shown,
they
had
been
shown
the
wrong
way,
and
it
got
them
into
trouble
with
the
law.
During
the
last
hunting
season,
this
was
demonstrated
to
me
in
the
most
obvious
of
ways.
Sundre
officers
had
determined
that
two
poachers
shot
five
illegal
deer.
All
of
the
animals
had
been
shot
from
the
window
of
a
vehicle,
tagged
with
tags
belonging
to
other
people,
and
one
deer
was
even
left
to
waste
because
it
wasn’t
considered
big
enough.
Officers
found
loaded
firearms
in
the
vehicle
when
they
eventually
caught
up
with
the
violators.
The
surprising
fact
was
that
the
two
suspects
were
accompanied
by
a
couple
of
young,
impressionable
14-year-olds.
According
to
the
judge
who
heard
the
case,
the
severity
of
the
violations
were
bad
enough,
but
the
fact
that
those
two
young
hunters
had
been
exposed
to
that
type
of
activity
was
deplorable.
The
youngsters
didn’t
even
realize
that
dad
was
doing
anything
wrong.
***
For
several
years,
Dan
Radomske,
an
Innisfail
outdoor
enthusiast
and
project
chairman
for
the
Alberta
Junior
Pheasant
project,
has
been
operating
a
program
for
first
time
hunters
aged
12
years
and
up.
Dan,
along
with
about
60
volunteer
guides
and
dog
handlers,
volunteers
his
time
and
land
to
the
project,
delivering
the
program
to
80
first
time
hunters
this
past
fall.
The
program
has
been
running
for
five
years,
each
weekend
from
September
15
to
mid
November.
Sponsorship
from
various
fish
and
wildlife
clubs,
businesses
and
individuals
is
extremely
important
because
the
program
is
free
for
the
students
and
all
costs,
including
clay
birds,
shotguns,
shells
and
the
daily
stocking
of
pheasants
and
turkeys
are
covered
by
the
program.
The
only
thing
that
parents
have
to
do
is
get
their
kids
to
the
farm
located
east
of
Innisfail.
The
goals
of
the
Alberta
Junior
Pheasant
project
are
to
have
first-time
hunters
experience
a
quality
hunt,
develop
skills
and
knowledge
and
adopt
a
positive
attitude
towards
hunting
and
foster
acceptable
behaviour
in
first
time
hunters
through
an
actual
hunting
experience.
The
objective
of
the
program
is
to
allow
the
students
to
develop
socially
and
personally
and
develop
an
understanding
of
hunting
ethics
and
conform
to
the
standards
that
are
expected
of
them
by
law
and
society.
As
well,
students
can
develop
a
positive
outlook
and
respect
for
the
opinions
of
rural
landowners
and
their
property
by
becoming
aware
of
how
their
behaviour
and
those
of
their
companions
affects
others.
The
course
educates
students
in
the
areas
of
hunting
ethics,
bird
identification,
wildlife
laws,
and
equipment
such
as
firearms,
ammunition,
field
techniques
like
cleaning
birds,
hunter/landowner
relationships,
pre-hunt
preparations
and
marksmanship.
After
volunteering
for
four
years,
this
project
definitely
has
my
endorsement.
The
benefits
are
incredible;
not
only
do
the
several
hundred
students
that
have
taken
this
opportunity
stand
to
learn
a
lot
about
ethics
and
sportsmanship,
but
the
guides
and
dog
handlers
also
learn
from
the
enthusiasm
and
eager
nature
of
these
fine
up
and
coming
hunters.
For
further
information
on
being
a
sponsor,
volunteer
guide,
dog
handler
or
new
student
for
next
year’s
program,
contact
Dan
at
1
(403)
227-2105
(Innisfail).

Jim
Mitchell
is
a
member
of
the
Alberta
Game
Warden
Association
in
Sundre. |
|